Showing posts with label community mobilization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label community mobilization. Show all posts

Friday, August 23, 2013

Statewide drug abuse prevention program eliminated


In 2011, Washington voters approved Initiative 1183 that increased the availability of liquor in our communities including among youth.  Though no liquor revenue was earmarked for underage drinking prevention, voters were assured that stores would check IDs.  What was not anticipated was the amount of liquor theft that would occur.  Stolen liquor often ends up in the hands of minors

In 2012, Washington voters approved Initiative 502 that will increase the availability of marijuana in our communities including among youth.  Though underage marijuana use prevention is to receive some of the anticipated revenue, prevention funding is needed now if we are serious about preventing youth use.  I-502 revenue will not cover all of our state’s prevention needs. 

That’s why it’s surprising and disheartening that the Washington State Legislature eliminated a statewide, evidence-based substance abuse prevention program during this year’s session.  The Community Mobilization program helped communities throughout our state address local problems that contributed to youth drug use.  Instead of increasing funding for youth substance abuse prevention during a time of major drug policy changes that will negatively impact youth, lawmakers chose just the opposite.

Community Mobilization was part of the Department of Commerce (healthy kids who are at low risk for dropping out of school are good for the economy) and here is a letter from the Deputy Director to stakeholders. 

August 20, 2013

Dear Community Mobilization contractors, policy board chairs, policy board members, and community stakeholders:

I wish to express my deep appreciation to each of you for your service to our great State of Washington over the past 24 years.

While I do not have the history with the program that you have, please know that I value the efforts and progress which were made in solving the problems of substance abuse and violence in every county in the state. I know from reading the reports and talking with your program manager, Ramona Leber, that you affected real change in people's lives and in your individual counties.

The Strengthening Families Program data alone proved that the intervention of a seven-week class where parents and youth came together and learned to run family meetings, as well as how to respectfully speak and listen to one another, proved to result in less family tension.  Research indicates this reduces problematic behaviors. 

Equally impressive are the ways in which your program design engaged local community stakeholders from various sectors in looking at data and thoughtfully selecting evidence-based programs and strategies. Community Mobilizers showed leadership coordinating the National Drug Take Back effort, successfully bringing 3,000 community members together to provide input to Governor Locke’s School Safety Summit, participating in the “Let's Draw the Line” state campaign to reduce underage drinking, and worked side-by-side with schools and community groups to prevent youth use of marijuana and other drugs.  The Meth Action Teams served as an impressive example of the power of linking prevention, intervention, and suppression efforts to solve what had been an out-of-control drug problem wreaking havoc on our communities. Under the combined leadership of the county Community Mobilization coordinator and the county Sheriff, these teams changed policies around precursor drug availability and, as a result, the problem of meth labs in Washington’s homes virtually disappeared.

For many of you, the Community Mobilization grant was not just a grant; it was a passion and a calling. You understood the importance of training and created a comprehensive curriculum, "The Art and Science of Community Organizing" for prevention professionals. You valued cultural competency and provided training that resulted in greater cultural awareness and formed true working relationships with diverse partners. 

You worked to leverage every substance abuse and violence prevention dollar wisely and worked collaboratively with the Washington State Prevention Redesign Initiative, the Washington State Family Policy Council Public Health and Safety Networks, and numerous other initiatives to make the community a safer place. Ms. Leber also noted that when the federal funds were eliminated and state funds reduced, you made the collective decision to keep every county funded so that all residents in Washington State could continue to have access to Community Mobilization programming and coordination. 

Your work has resulted in healthier youth, families, and communities. On behalf of the Department of Commerce and the citizens of Washington State, I thank you for your years of service.

Sincerely, 
Dan McConnon
Deputy Director

Friday, April 12, 2013

WA House budget amended to include Community Mobilization

During last night's Washington State House Appropriations Committee meeting, the proposed state budget was amended to include funding for the statewide Community Moblization Program thanks to Representative Laurie Jinkins.  Rep. Jinkins was the only person to speak in favor of the amendment and nobody spoke in opposition. 



The meeting may also be viewed by clicking here

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

A message for our legislators

Clean up the alcohol privatization mess and allocate funding to prevent substance abuse and support youth!

Alcohol privatization is creating more harm than expected: I-1183, the initiative that privatized the sale of hard alcohol, may have sounded simple, but the actual initiative is 60 pages long and mandates sweeping changes to liquor sales, wine sales, regulatory enforcement and advertising. I-1183 makes Washington the most deregulated state in the nation and implementing it is turning out to be quite costly.

Prevention funding has been cut: Meanwhile, since 2005, funding for substance abuse prevention was reduced by more than 70% -- community-based prevention services (Community Mobilization) by 73% and school-based prevention/intervention services (Student Assistance Program) by78%! 

Stop the harm BEFORE more is created! To restore both programs to 2005 levels of funding, $15Million per year is needed. Funding for substance abuse prevention is necessary BEFORE alcohol and other drugs become more accessible to our children and youth…

• BEFORE more bills are passed that normalize the use of alcohol in everyday life;

• BEFORE alcohol is fully privatized;

• BEFORE marijuana is legalized.

This can be done! An I-1183 clean up bill should:

• Designate alcohol revenue for a balanced approach to prevention, treatment, and enforcement by the Liquor Control Board.

• Add a standard sales tax on top of liquor taxes to generate revenue for cities.

• Establish a statewide cap on alcohol outlet density, as numerous studies across the nation have shown that an increase in outlet density – how many stores are in a certain area -- can lead to increased alcohol-related public health problems.

• Raise licensing fees by 30%, generating $6M for Community Mobilization and prevention and intervention services in schools. A 30% increase would result in a typical grocery store paying $195 per year.

• Increase the long-stagnant beer tax rate.

Enough is enough! It’s time to stop the erosion of a system that protects our children and youth and provides communities and schools the resources they need!

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Bill to provide funds for prevention-intervention and community mobilization

Last year, WASAVP was behind HB 2014 concerning liquor licensing fees.  The bill would have increased liquor licensing fees and allocated some of the revenue to replace some of the funding that has been cut for prevention-intervention services in schools and the statewide community mobilization program.

The bill did not make it out of the House Ways & Means Committee but may still be alive for the upcoming legislative session.  WASAVP is now asking prevention advocates to contact their state legislators and tell them about the bill.  Advocates do not need to say that they are for or against the bill.  Advocates may inform their Representatives of the bill's status and educate them about the importance of prevention-intervention services in schools and community mobilization in communities. 

With the legislature and the Liquor Control Board re-vamping the liquor system in response to I-1183, this is an especially opportune time to advocate for changes to licensing fees.